Maybe with a reversed flow : not the one who finds the most, but the one in whom the least is found should be rewarded. I guess we can’t rule out other biases.
The best way I’ve found is by using a combination of measures to counter Goodhart’s Law. I’ve also discussed it at length in the post that’s linked in the article, if you’re interested in checking it out.
Very interesting, thank you.
Despite the side effects, I think running an internal bug bounty program is a really smart move.
Maybe with a reversed flow : not the one who finds the most, but the one in whom the least is found should be rewarded. I guess we can’t rule out other biases.
The best way I’ve found is by using a combination of measures to counter Goodhart’s Law. I’ve also discussed it at length in the post that’s linked in the article, if you’re interested in checking it out.
Agreed - no harm in the program itself. What matters is how the incentives are set and measured.
I’m a firm believer of systems thinking applied to management, but had not thought it through as thoroughly as you did: thank you!
If interested, I wrote something in the same ballpark a while back - you can find it here: https://open.substack.com/pub/theintentionalmanager/p/the-hidden-enemy-of-change-your-systems?r=5bq0ac&utm_medium=ios
Thanks for the share, Luca, will check it out